Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 30(8): 4390-4397, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32193639

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore differences in the clinical management of men and women in the 5 years after detecting a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) by chest radiograph or CT in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We followed up 545 men and 347 women with an SPN detected by chest radiograph or CT in a retrospective cohort of 25,422 individuals undergoing routine thoracic imaging in 2010-2011. We compared the frequency of each management strategy (no further test, immediate intervention or follow up) according to sex by means of chi-squared. We estimated the relative risk of women versus men of having been followed up instead of an immediate intervention using multivariate logistic regression. We compared by sex the time between detection of the nodule and lung cancer diagnosis, the time between diagnosis and death by means of Mann-Whitney U test and the cumulative effective dose of radiation in each management strategy by means of t test. RESULTS: Women were more likely than men to have follow-up rather than immediate intervention (aRR = 1.8, CI 1.3-2.7, p = 0.002), particularly in those who underwent CT (aRR = 4.2, CI 1.9-9.3, p < 0.001). The median time between SPN detection and lung cancer diagnosis was higher in women (4.2 months, interquartile range (IQR) 5.1) than in men (1.5 months, IQR 16.2). The mean cumulative effective dose was 21.3 mSv, 19.4 mSv in men and 23.9mv in women (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Our results could reflect decisions based on a greater suspicion of lung cancer in men. The incidental detection of SPNs is increasing, and it is necessary to establish clear strategies aimed to reduce variability in their management according to patient's sex. KEY POINTS: • After incidental finding of SPN, women were less likely to receive an immediate intervention. • Accumulative radiation was higher in women than in men. • Our results could reflect decisions based on a greater suspicion of lung cancer in men.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Mortalidad , Dosis de Radiación , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Modelos Logísticos , Pulmón , Masculino , Hombres , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Radiografía Torácica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , España , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Mujeres
2.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0221134, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31509550

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with lung cancer diagnosis and mortality after detecting a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) in routine clinical practice, in men and in women for both chest radiograph and CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-year follow-up of a retrospective cohort of of 25,422 (12,594 men, 12,827 women) patients aged ≥35 years referred for chest radiograph or CT in two hospitals in Spain (2010-2011). SPN were detected in 893 (546 men, 347 women) patients. We estimated the cumulative incidence of lung cancer at 5-years, the association of patient and nodule characteristics with SPN malignancy using Poisson logistic regression, stratifying by sex and type of imaging test. We calculated lung cancer specific mortality rate by sex and SPN detection and hazard rates by cox regression. RESULTS: 133 (14.9%) out of 893 patients with an SPN and 505 (2.06%) of the 24,529 patients without SPN were diagnosed with lung cancer. Median diameter of SPN in women who developed cancer was larger than in men. Men who had a chest radiograph were more likely to develop a lung cancer if the nodule was in the upper-lobes, which was not the case for women. In patients with an SPN, smoking increased the risk of lung cancer among men (chest radiograph: RR = 11.3, 95%CI 1.5-83.3; CT: RR = 7.5, 95%CI 2.2, 26.0) but smoking was not significantly associated with lung cancer diagnosis or mortality among women with an SPN. The relative risk of lung cancer diagnosis in women with SPN versus those without was much higher compared to men (13.7; 95%CI 9.2, 20.4 versus 6.2; 95%CI 4.9,7.9). CONCLUSION: The factors associated with SPN malignancy and 5-year lung cancer mortality were different among men and women, especially regarding smoking history and SPN characteristics, where we observed a relatively high rate of lung cancer diagnosis among female non-smokers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Radiografía Torácica , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...